Will the US be attacked by "terrorists" next and if so how many of you will accept the official story without?

  • Posted by cfz on March 12th, 2010 filed in portal.jsqf.com

  • question?


  • THE OFFICIAL STORY WILL BE
    BUSH DID NOTHING TO PROTECT THE HOMELAND WHILE HE CHASED IMAGINARY WMD'S IN IRAQ


  • possibly although I figure that the fourth reich cabal wouldn't be that reckless since they barely got away with the last false flag terror attack on 9-11. I think that only the cabalists and their brainwashed lackeys will buy the official story if it happens again.


  • No, because President Bush has made certain through his policies of Homeland Security that such an attack will not occur on American soil again. Please do not attempt to ask terribly constructed questions and then bark about how people should answer them. It is unbecoming of someone who needs knowledge and education.

    Oh look!! Zon Moy, the anti-American poster is back!


  • I suspect that if the buzz about us 'being at war' is true it stands to reason that the US will be attacked. What do you expect? That certain groups of people that we call 'terrorists' are going to accept being bombed, shot and imprisoned because they insist on fighting westerners who are attempting to occupy their counties? This 'war' goes back for a full century when American and European powers showed up in the middle east to help themselves to all the the oil they could get. The western powers carved up their lands, appointed various 'kings' or dictators to do their dirty work and generally treated the native populations like dirt. That's not the 'official story', but that's the truth of the matter. They're not fighting us because they hate our freedom. They're fighting us because we screwed those people! I know that sounds harsh, but from their point of view that's exactly what happened. All of this could have been avoided had we not put our entire nation in jeopardy by adopting an 'oil only' energy policy, or at least left those people out of our power politics. I'm sure all of this bad policy stemmed from our 'white man's burden' philosophy and our basic racism toward non-christian people. Unfortunately we're now stuck with this 'war' and will be for as long as we're on their turf. We can hurt them, but not defeat them. They can hurt us as well. Why does this remind me of the Hatfields and McCoys? Someone, and it's going to have to be someone on our side, is going to have to stop waving the flag, stop worrying about being called a 'surrender monkey' or an appeaser and cut a deal before some one gets hurt! Other wise this sordid business will go on forever. What's good about that?


  • next what?


  • Depends what the story is.

    If the President stands up there and says "Well, America, we were attacked because we are the best nation, the most free. Frankly, THEY ARE JUST JEALOUS OF US." - uh no.

    There is a higher chance of me believing it if they give me the motives with as little bias as possible.

    Also, if after they give the story they use it to justify something evil...tough luck.


  • why are u asking such a dumb question
    dont even mention it
    when it happens wtf are u gonna do about it
    what if one of ur family gets hurt
    who cares what the dam story is it happened and nothing can change it


  • Hey man, I understand your questioning authority, but the "Right" of Y!A will report you if they think your a "conspiracy theorist" and your questions will mysteriously disappear before they post. You have to be aware that some people don't want others to see what they feel may damage their party!


  • Yes, probably. I'll accept the "official" story if it holds up to bipartisan, historical, and personal scrutinization. I will not just swallow blindly some attempted explanation by the current administration, whatever that administration is, and an extremely biased media nor will I accept wild conspiracy theories. I'd have to look at the facts provided by both parties, by independent committees, by scientists and social scientists, etc. Just like I did before completely forming an opinion about the Sept. 11th attacks.


  • depends who is telling it.


  • if the us is attacked before obama takes over, look forawrd to keeping bush as our next president. He passed legislation that states if the counrty is attacked, all ruling members of the government stay in office.

    hope for peace my friend, hope for peace.


  • If I actually witness the event (like on television) and the government's story coincides what any intelligent person can see with their own eyes, I'd be a fool not to accept it.


  • look if you or some1 in ur family had actually experienced a terror attack, u would believe it instead of coming up with stupid conspiracy theories


  • its only a matter of time before were attacked by terrorist again and i will only belive what i belive sounds within reason.


  • If we keep sticking our noses in the business of other nations, and insist on the blind obedience to the wishes of Israel, then yes, there is a good possibility we will suffer another attack, and no, I will not accept any so-called official version of events from our government.
    Just too much cover up and lies in the past. Good example, the USS Liberty and the attack by Israel.







    • #If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.#
    Your name:
    E-mail:
    Telphone:

    Your comments:


    If you have any other info about Will the US be attacked by "terrorists" next and if so how many of you will accept the official story without? , Please add it free.